Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.0.1 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

    • CommentAuthorultimate7
    • CommentTimeJan 30th 2008
     permalink
    This place has been dead so here's something to talk about:

    Rumor has it there will be some changes such as roster limits (27 is the rumored number possibly not until 2009 season).

    Anyone know much else? I think also possibly there will be a grandmasters division and the reopening of the Women's masters division.

    I'm for roster limits, 27 while a bit high is a start.
  1.  permalink
    I've also read that there will be a roster limit of 27. Also about grand masters (are you eligible yet gary), and women's masters.

    http://icultimate.blogspot.com/2008/01/conversation-with-upa.html

    I don't think the roster limit will have much affect on the Chicago ultimate community, but had the number been lower - say 20 - I think the impact would have been great. Machine 25, Haymaker 26 , Briefcase 24, Nemesis ?, Gambit ?.

    I think the most interesting aspects of a lower roster limit (say 20) are as follows:

    Cons
    - it would probably slightly decrease the caliber of each individual team at the top (less rest/more fatigue for the top players on top teams)
    - on film/tv, the game may look slower and show less athleticisim (more points played per weekend = fewer spectacular plays, conservation)
    - division of talent = lower overall quality of top team from each area
    - if the limit were too low there could be challenges with scheduling/holding practices - missing players means you could struggle for 7v7

    Pros
    - it might cause major metro powerhouse areas to have in-town rivalries (seattle, vancouver, san francisco, etc) - increasing competition, exposure, press, etc
    - potentially more teams at sectionals - what I wouldn't give for more teams at sectionals!
    - possible growth and increasingly competitive coed division (some would consider this a con)
    - possibly greater number of upsets
    - farm teams might be more prevalent

    I wondered how it might affect Chicago if the limit were lower. I think it would narrow the competitive gap somewhat between Machine and Haymaker for instance IF those players joined Haymaker, but honestly I suspect it might have a greater impact on Briefcase and/or Indiana club teams. It would be interesting to see what would happen, but at 27, I don't think any of us will notice the limit. Will be interesting to see what happens over the next few years.

    Thoughts?
    • CommentAuthorultimate7
    • CommentTimeJan 30th 2008
     permalink
    I honestly would like to see a number of about 21. This might force teams to change practice schedule, it might encourage teams to practice against each other team on occasion #1 and #2 from certain areas and hopefully would create more competitive teams. It would also give slightly more advantage to teams that did more conditioning. In general I think it might push the game back a bit more to skill based instead of just having the fastest 27 guys around and making them all specialists, more people would have to be able to do more things.
  2.  permalink
    Grand Masters? Come on, so they can have 1.5 teams at regionals and 5 at nationals? Nice.
    • CommentAuthorultimate7
    • CommentTimeFeb 15th 2008
     permalink
    Posted By: danielbaker1I can't wait until I'm 40
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as